Update Pt. 2

  I've been keeping everyone informed on my status with my appeal. It is good entertainment and free drama if you are not the one in the situation.

Pierce county responded to my letter by informing me they needed until April 25, 2025 to provide me the cost of the next installment. My deadline to file my statement of additional grounds is April 28, 2025. Expecting problems I informed the Division Two Court I believed Pierce County would cause me problems in an attempt to squeeze me against a deadline that is growing increasingly impossible to meet and them burring me in bureaucratic red tape and shifting deadlines. I decided the only way to win at their game was to not play it! So, I finalized my statement of additional grounds and submitted it with supporting documentation (Pierce County Sheriff Department Supplemental Report and Declaration Of Probable Cause). I can not post Appendix A and B for you, but, I can present my statement of additional grounds. I will place my case from start to finish including Appeal in the first volume of 'Behind the Eyes of the Convicted'. I will keep everyone updated on its status as I walk through the publishing process. Because this is filed with the court I did not change names or places. They were abbreviated for privacy reasons. My name was substituted for my pseudonym. Everyone take Care! Statement of Additional Grounds Issues: Where the elements of RCW 9.35.020 (1) met at the time the appellant was charged? Argument: The crime of identity theft has four elements, 1.The defendant knowingly used a means of financial information or identification of another person. 2.The defendant did so with the intent to commit any crime. 3.The defendant knew the means of identification belonged to another person. 4.The acts occurred in Washington. Facts: On March 27, 2023, 1. R.S reported he believed a vehicle was fraudulently purchased two days prior from L.K.L.M on March 25, 2023. 2. S, description of the unknown suspect was a black male, mid to late twenties. 3.Upon arrest, there was no positive identification of the appellant by S or dealership employees as the signatory and receiver of property in question. 4. S, provided no signed: 4.1.Financing Agreement 4.2.Loan Paperwork 4.3.Vehicle Application 4.4.Borrowed Car Agreement 4.5.Insurance Policy 4.6.Video of appellant or transaction 5.The appellant was arrested in Auburn then transferred into pierce county custody. March 28, 2023 1.Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, M.N Thomas charged appellant with: 1.1.Identity theft in the first degree 1.2.Theft of a motor vehicle 1.3.Unlawful possession of fictitious identification 2.NCFF (No charges filed finalized) RCW. 9A.56.320 (4) Conclusion: Did the prosecution abuse their discretion to charge by bringing charges whose elements were not supported by probable cause against the appellant? Did prosecuting attorney Thomas perjure himself? 1NF@MOUS! Appellant Dated: April 14, 2025